Fragrance comparison

17 vs Magnificent Pour Homme

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 14 Oct 2026 100 ratings analysed

The Fragrance Kitchen

3.001 votes

Rank #64,778 FruityGreen

Full profile Similar & dupes

18%scent match

Clearly different

Magnificent Pour Homme

Armaf

3.9399 votes

Rank #7,544 WoodyVanilla

Full profile Similar & dupes

Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

No clear winner: the 4 categories split 2–2.

17
Choose it for a fruity and green character. Wins on longevity and value for money. Best in spring, day or night wear.
Magnificent Pour Homme
Choose it for a woody and vanilla character. Wins on sillage & projection and fragranxe ranking. Best in winter.

172/4

Magnificent Pour Homme2/4

Ratings & consensus: Not scored
Community sentiment: Not scored
Longevity: 17
Sillage & projection: Magnificent Pour Homme
Value for money: 17
Versatility: Not scored
Note pyramid (duration): Not scored
Fragranxe ranking: Magnificent Pour Homme

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance

17The Fragrance Kitchen

Magnificent Pour HommeArmaf

Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split

3.00/ 5 · 1 votes

Have 10%Had 10%Want 80%

3.93/ 5 · 99 votes

Have 49%Had 12%Want 40%

Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate

Not enough votes yet

46%Love

24%Like

9%Ok

16%Dislike

4%Hate

99 votes

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores

⏱ Longevity90

〰 Sillage50

♥ Love / hateN/A

⏱ Longevity70

〰 Sillage65

♥ Love / hate73

Category winners

Longevity17

SillageMagnificent Pour Homme

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it

¤ Price value100

¤ Price value79

Category winner17Best value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both

fruity100%

green92%

floral84%

powdery77%

fresh69%

rose61%

woody100%

vanilla92%

citrus84%

powdery77%

musky69%

fresh spicy61%

Scent match18%Clearly different · both powdery

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared

Top

AppleKiwiGalbanum

Heart

RoseLilacPowdery Notes

Base

MuskWoody NotesAmyl Salicylate

Top

GrapefruitBergamotGalbanum

Heart

AppleSpicesGinger

Base

VanillaSuedeWoody NotesMuskCedarPatchouli

InformationalShared notesApple, Galbanum, Musk and Woody Notes. Note durations are not published for these fragrances, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season

Spring100

Summer100

Fall100

Winter100

Day100

Night100

Spring79

Summer47

Fall87

Winter100

Day–

Night–

Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes

Men0

Unisex100

Women0

Men69

Unisex23

Women8

InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#64,778

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Overall rank#7,544

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews27

Category winnerMagnificent Pour HommeHigher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

17 by The Fragrance Kitchen opens with a tart bite of crisp apple and sharp kiwi, snapped across bitter galbanum greenness. The fruitiness feels cool rather than sugary, drifting quickly into a fresh floral heart of dewy rose and lilac. Dry down brings out a subtle haze of powdery notes grounded by clean musk and dry …

Reviews →

Armaf Magnificent Pour Homme opens with a sharp burst of bergamot and bitter galbanum, presenting a green, slightly vintage citrus profile that quickly shifts. Within twenty minutes, the initial tartness settles into a sweet, spiced apple and warm ginger heart. The fragrance sits on a rich base of suede, cedar, and va…

Reviews →

InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, 17 or Magnificent Pour Homme?

No clear winner: the 4 categories split 2–2. 17 is rated 3.00/5 from 1 votes; Magnificent Pour Homme is rated 3.93/5 from 99 votes. Choose 17 for a fruity and green character. Wins on longevity and value for money. Best in spring, day or night wear. Choose Magnificent Pour Homme for a woody and vanilla character. Wins on sillage & projection and fragranxe ranking. Best in winter.

Which lasts longer, 17 or Magnificent Pour Homme?

17 lasts longest (17 90/100, Magnificent Pour Homme 70/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, 17 or Magnificent Pour Homme?

Magnificent Pour Homme projects furthest (Magnificent Pour Homme 65/100, 17 50/100), based on community performance votes.

Do 17 and Magnificent Pour Homme smell similar?

Clearly different: a 18% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share powdery accords. Common notes include Apple, Galbanum, Musk and Woody Notes.

Is 17 or Magnificent Pour Homme better for summer or winter?

17 suits day or night wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in 17 and Magnificent Pour Homme?

17 has top notes of Apple, Kiwi and Galbanum, heart notes of Rose, Lilac and Powdery Notes, a base of Musk, Woody Notes and Amyl Salicylate. Magnificent Pour Homme has top notes of Grapefruit, Bergamot and Galbanum, heart notes of Apple, Spices and Ginger, a base of Vanilla, Suede, Woody Notes and Musk.