Fragrance comparison

Adidas 1958 Goool! vs Nature System

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 19 Oct 2026 5 ratings analysed

2 wins

Adidas 1958 Goool!

Adidas

3.205 votes

Rank #63,799 CitrusGreen

Full profile Similar & dupes

59%scent match

Closely related

Nature System

Roger & Gallet

—0 votes

Rank #67,274 AromaticGreen

Full profile Similar & dupes

Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

Adidas 1958 Goool! takes 2 of 2 categories.

Adidas 1958 Goool!
Choose it for a citrus and green character. Wins on longevity and fragranxe ranking. Best in fall, day or night wear.
Nature System
Choose it for a aromatic and green character. Best in spring, day or night wear.

Adidas 1958 Goool!2/2

Nature System0/2

Ratings & consensus: Not scored
Community sentiment: Not scored
Longevity: Adidas 1958 Goool!
Sillage & projection: Not scored
Value for money: Not scored
Versatility: Not scored
Note pyramid (duration): Not scored
Fragranxe ranking: Adidas 1958 Goool!

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance

Adidas 1958 Goool!Adidas

Nature SystemRoger & Gallet

Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split

3.20/ 5 · 5 votes

Have 11%Had 56%Want 33%

—/ 5 · 0 votes

Have 14%Had 14%Want 71%

Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate

20%Love

20%Like

40%Ok

0%Dislike

20%Hate

5 votes · too few to score

Not enough votes yet

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores

⏱ Longevity30

〰 Sillage25

♥ Love / hate55

⏱ Longevity20

〰 SillageN/A

♥ Love / hateN/A

Category winners

LongevityAdidas 1958 Goool!

SillageNo data

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it

¤ Price value38

¤ Price valueN/A

Category winnerNot enough dataBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both

citrus100%

green83%

fresh65%

fresh spicy48%

aromatic30%

aromatic100%

green88%

citrus77%

warm spicy65%

woody53%

fresh spicy42%

Scent match59%Closely related · both citrus, green and aromatic

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared

Notes

Herbal NotesCitrusesGreen Notes

No top / heart / base split published

Notes

CrithmumGreen NotesCitrusesCypress

No top / heart / base split published

InformationalShared notesCitruses and Green Notes. Note durations are not published for these fragrances, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season

Spring50

Summer0

Fall100

Winter50

Day100

Night100

Spring100

Summer100

Fall100

Winter0

Day100

Night100

Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes

Men67

Unisex33

Women0

Not enough votes yet

InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#63,799

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Overall rank#67,274

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Category winnerAdidas 1958 Goool!Higher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Adidas 1958 Goool! by Adidas is a Woody Aromatic fragrance for men. Adidas 1958 Goool! was launched in 2013.

Reviews →

Nature System reads as a crisp green aromatic with a bracing citrus lift, herbal freshness and a dry cypress edge. It feels closer to an old-school cologne style than a modern sweet unisex scent. If you like sharp, leafy, slightly woody freshness and do not need big performance, this is the kind of discontinued Roger …

Reviews →

InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.