FRAGRANXE
Fragrance comparison

Burberrys for Men (1981) vs Count

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 132 ratings analysed
Some overlap
Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

Burberrys for Men (1981) takes 3 of 5 categories.

  • Burberrys for Men (1981)

    Choose it for a aromatic and woody character. Wins on ratings & consensus, longevity and fragranxe ranking. Best in fall, daytime wear.

  • Count

    Choose it for a woody and aromatic character. Wins on sillage & projection and value for money. Best in fall, daytime wear.

Burberrys for Men (1981)3/5
Count2/5
Ratings & consensus
Burberrys for Men (1981)
Community sentiment
Not scored
Longevity
Burberrys for Men (1981)
Sillage & projection
Count
Value for money
Count
Versatility
Not scored
Note pyramid (duration)
Not scored
Fragranxe ranking
Burberrys for Men (1981)

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance
Burberrys for Men (1981)Burberry
CountMarc Joseph
Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split
4.38/ 5 · 120 votes
Have 64%Had 36%Want 0%
4.33/ 5 · 12 votes
Have 69%Had 16%Want 16%
Category winnerBurberrys for Men (1981)Rating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate
49%Love
44%Like
3%Ok
4%Dislike
0%Hate

120 votes

33%Love
67%Like
0%Ok
0%Dislike
0%Hate

12 votes · too few to score

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores
⏱ Longevity77
〰 Sillage64
♥ Love / hate85
⏱ Longevity74
〰 Sillage65
♥ Love / hate83
Category winners

LongevityBurberrys for Men (1981)

SillageCount

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it
¤ Price value50
¤ Price value75
Category winnerCountBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both
aromatic100%
woody92%
fresh spicy84%
warm spicy77%
animalic69%
musky61%
woody100%
aromatic90%
lavender80%
fresh spicy70%
citrus60%
herbal50%
Scent match48%Some overlap · both woody, aromatic and fresh spicy

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared
Top
MintArtemisiaBergamotJuniperThymeLavender
Heart
PatchouliVetiverCarnationRoseSandalwoodCedarGeraniumMarjoram
Base
LeatherMyrrhCivetOakmossMuskAmber
Top15-30 mins
BergamotLemon
Heart2-4 hrs
LavenderMarjoram
Base6-8 hrs
SandalwoodCedar
InformationalShared notesBergamot, Lavender, Sandalwood and Cedar. Durations are only published for Count, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season
Spring59
Summer27
Fall100
Winter67
Day100
Night89
Spring60
Summer60
Fall100
Winter100
Day100
Night41
Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes
Men93
Unisex4
Women4
Men27
Unisex73
Women0
Work 38%Casual 35%Date 16%Party 11%
InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#4,942

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews19

Overall rank#33,072

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews3

Category winnerBurberrys for Men (1981)Higher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Burberrys for Men (1981) opens with a sharp burst of bitter artemisia, herbal juniper, and fresh mint that immediately establishes its vintage chypre character. As the initial green flash softens, dark patchouli and spicy carnation emerge alongside cedar, giving the heart a dry, outdoorsy warmth. The base settles into…

Reviews →

Marc Joseph Count opens with a crisp splash of tart lemon and bright bergamot that wakes up the senses without smelling synthetic. Give it five minutes. The citrus settles quickly into an aromatic heart dominated by French lavender and crushed herbal marjoram, giving off a clean, mountain-air crispness. As body heat w…

Reviews →
InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Burberrys for Men (1981) or Count?

Burberrys for Men (1981) takes 3 of 5 categories. Burberrys for Men (1981) is rated 4.38/5 from 120 votes; Count is rated 4.33/5 from 12 votes. Choose Burberrys for Men (1981) for a aromatic and woody character. Wins on ratings & consensus, longevity and fragranxe ranking. Best in fall, daytime wear. Choose Count for a woody and aromatic character. Wins on sillage & projection and value for money. Best in fall, daytime wear.

Which lasts longer, Burberrys for Men (1981) or Count?

Burberrys for Men (1981) lasts longest (Burberrys for Men (1981) 77/100, Count 74/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, Burberrys for Men (1981) or Count?

Projection is very close: Count 65/100, Burberrys for Men (1981) 64/100 for sillage.

Do Burberrys for Men (1981) and Count smell similar?

Some overlap: a 48% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share woody, aromatic and fresh spicy accords. Common notes include Bergamot, Lavender, Sandalwood and Cedar.

Is Burberrys for Men (1981) or Count better for summer or winter?

Burberrys for Men (1981) suits daytime wear; Count suits daytime wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Burberrys for Men (1981) and Count?

Burberrys for Men (1981) has top notes of Mint, Artemisia, Bergamot and Juniper, heart notes of Patchouli, Vetiver, Carnation and Rose, a base of Leather, Myrrh, Civet and Oakmoss. Count has top notes of Bergamot and Lemon, heart notes of Lavender and Marjoram, a base of Sandalwood and Cedar.

Recent comparisons

Head-to-head activity from live history
Add to comparison

Find a fragrance