FRAGRANXE
Fragrance comparison

Burberrys for Men (1981) vs Tanaaghom

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 130 ratings analysed
Some overlap
Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

Tanaaghom takes 3 of 5 categories.

  • Burberrys for Men (1981)

    Choose it for a aromatic and woody character. Wins on ratings & consensus and fragranxe ranking. Best in fall, daytime wear.

  • Tanaaghom

    Choose it for a warm spicy and rose character. Wins on longevity, sillage & projection and value for money. Best in summer, day or night wear.

Burberrys for Men (1981)2/5
Tanaaghom3/5
Ratings & consensus
Burberrys for Men (1981)
Community sentiment
Not scored
Longevity
Tanaaghom
Sillage & projection
Tanaaghom
Value for money
Tanaaghom
Versatility
Not scored
Note pyramid (duration)
Not scored
Fragranxe ranking
Burberrys for Men (1981)

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance
Burberrys for Men (1981)Burberry
TanaaghomAjmal
Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split
4.38/ 5 · 120 votes
Have 64%Had 36%Want 0%
3.80/ 5 · 10 votes
Have 19%Had 16%Want 65%
Category winnerBurberrys for Men (1981)Rating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate
49%Love
44%Like
3%Ok
4%Dislike
0%Hate

120 votes

40%Love
30%Like
0%Ok
30%Dislike
0%Hate

10 votes · too few to score

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores
⏱ Longevity77
〰 Sillage64
♥ Love / hate85
⏱ Longevity83
〰 Sillage84
♥ Love / hate70
Category winners

LongevityTanaaghom

SillageTanaaghom

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it
¤ Price value50
¤ Price value75
Category winnerTanaaghomBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both
aromatic100%
woody92%
fresh spicy84%
warm spicy77%
animalic69%
musky61%
warm spicy100%
rose90%
floral80%
fresh spicy70%
woody60%
amber50%
Scent match38%Some overlap · both warm spicy, fresh spicy and woody

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared
Top
MintArtemisiaBergamotJuniperThymeLavender
Heart
PatchouliVetiverCarnationRoseSandalwoodCedarGeraniumMarjoram
Base
LeatherMyrrhCivetOakmossMuskAmber
Top
Carnation
Heart
RosePepper
Base
SandalwoodAmber
InformationalShared notesCarnation, Rose, Sandalwood and Amber. Note durations are not published for these fragrances, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season
Spring59
Summer27
Fall100
Winter67
Day100
Night89
Spring50
Summer100
Fall50
Winter50
Day100
Night100
Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes
Men93
Unisex4
Women4
Men0
Unisex0
Women100
InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#4,882

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews19

Overall rank#55,707

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Category winnerBurberrys for Men (1981)Higher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Burberrys for Men (1981) opens with a sharp burst of bitter artemisia, herbal juniper, and fresh mint that immediately establishes its vintage chypre character. As the initial green flash softens, dark patchouli and spicy carnation emerge alongside cedar, giving the heart a dry, outdoorsy warmth. The base settles into…

Reviews →

Tanaaghom by Ajmal is a warm, spicy floral built around carnation and rose, with a peppery lift that keeps it from feeling too soft. As it dries down, sandalwood and amber smooth the edges into a cosy, slightly powdery finish. If you like classic, rosy Middle Eastern style blends that feel dressed up rather than casua…

Reviews →
InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Burberrys for Men (1981) or Tanaaghom?

Tanaaghom takes 3 of 5 categories. Burberrys for Men (1981) is rated 4.38/5 from 120 votes; Tanaaghom is rated 3.80/5 from 10 votes. Choose Burberrys for Men (1981) for a aromatic and woody character. Wins on ratings & consensus and fragranxe ranking. Best in fall, daytime wear. Choose Tanaaghom for a warm spicy and rose character. Wins on longevity, sillage & projection and value for money. Best in summer, day or night wear.

Which lasts longer, Burberrys for Men (1981) or Tanaaghom?

Tanaaghom lasts longest (Tanaaghom 83/100, Burberrys for Men (1981) 77/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, Burberrys for Men (1981) or Tanaaghom?

Tanaaghom projects furthest (Tanaaghom 84/100, Burberrys for Men (1981) 64/100), based on community performance votes.

Do Burberrys for Men (1981) and Tanaaghom smell similar?

Some overlap: a 38% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share warm spicy, fresh spicy and woody accords. Common notes include Carnation, Rose, Sandalwood and Amber.

Is Burberrys for Men (1981) or Tanaaghom better for summer or winter?

Burberrys for Men (1981) suits daytime wear; Tanaaghom suits day or night wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Burberrys for Men (1981) and Tanaaghom?

Burberrys for Men (1981) has top notes of Mint, Artemisia, Bergamot and Juniper, heart notes of Patchouli, Vetiver, Carnation and Rose, a base of Leather, Myrrh, Civet and Oakmoss. Tanaaghom has top notes of Carnation, heart notes of Rose and Pepper, a base of Sandalwood and Amber.

Recent comparisons

Head-to-head activity from live history
Add to comparison

Find a fragrance