Fragrance comparison

From Patiala vs Vintage 1933

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 30 Oct 2026 12 ratings analysed

From Patiala

The Dua Brand

4.502 votes

Rank #43,847 AldehydicAmber

Full profile Similar & dupes

31%scent match

Clearly different

3 wins

Vintage 1933

The Dua Brand

4.2010 votes

Rank #21,105 GreenCitrus

Full profile Similar & dupes

Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

Vintage 1933 takes 3 of 5 categories.

From Patiala
Choose it for a aldehydic and amber character. Wins on sillage & projection and value for money.
Vintage 1933
Choose it for a green and citrus character. Wins on longevity, note pyramid duration and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, day or night wear.

From Patiala2/5

Vintage 19333/5

Ratings & consensus: Not scored
Community sentiment: Not scored
Longevity: Vintage 1933
Sillage & projection: From Patiala
Value for money: From Patiala
Versatility: Not scored
Note pyramid (duration): Vintage 1933
Fragranxe ranking: Vintage 1933

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance

From PatialaThe Dua Brand

Vintage 1933The Dua Brand

Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split

4.50/ 5 · 2 votes

Have 50%Had 38%Want 13%

4.20/ 5 · 10 votes

Have 54%Had 14%Want 32%

Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate

50%Love

50%Like

0%Ok

0%Dislike

0%Hate

2 votes · too few to score

70%Love

10%Like

0%Ok

10%Dislike

10%Hate

10 votes · too few to score

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores

⏱ Longevity60

〰 Sillage75

♥ Love / hate88

⏱ Longevity68

〰 Sillage50

♥ Love / hate80

Category winners

LongevityVintage 1933

SillageFrom Patiala

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it

¤ Price value100

¤ Price value75

Category winnerFrom PatialaBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both

aldehydic100%

amber92%

mossy84%

musky77%

rose69%

white floral61%

green100%

citrus92%

powdery84%

aldehydic77%

aromatic69%

mossy61%

Scent match31%Clearly different · both aldehydic and mossy

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared

Notes

Orange BlossomAldehydesOakmossAmberRoseMusk

No top / heart / base split published

Notes

AldehydesGalbanumOakmossNarcissusSpicesBergamotMuskOrris RootOrange BlossomSandalwoodIndonesian CarnationMandarin Orange

No top / heart / base split published

Category winnerVintage 1933Longest dry-down: 6-8+ hrs

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season

No season votes yet

Spring100

Summer100

Fall100

Winter100

Day100

Night100

Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes

Not enough votes yet

Men17

Unisex33

Women50

InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#43,847

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews1

Overall rank#21,105

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews8

Category winnerVintage 1933Higher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

From Patiala by The Dua Brand presents an oriental floral profile built around crisp aldehydes, lush rose, and rich amber. The fragrance opens with a burst of bright aldehydes paired with sweet orange blossom, offering a fresh, soapy lift that feels classic yet vibrant. As the scent develops, velvety rose takes center…

Reviews →

Vintage 1933 by The Dua Brand is an Extrait de Parfum tribute to vintage green ambers, taking inspiration from classic early aviation scents like 1933 Vol de Nuit. It opens with an unmistakable rush of soapy aldehydes, bitter green galbanum, and sharp bergamot citrus. As the brisk opening settles, powdery iris, clove-…

Reviews →

InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Recent comparisons

Head-to-head activity from live history

Ho Hang ClubBalenciagaWINNER vs

Jil Sander Man IIIJil SanderRUNNER-UP

1 person compared this today

Very ValentinoValentinoRUNNER-UP vs

Sonia RykielSonia RykielWINNER

1 person compared this today

Poseidon VictoriaInstituto EspañolRUNNER-UP vs

Guipure & SilkJeanne ArthesWINNER

1 person compared this today

Mrs. Sultan's Elixir 56The Dua BrandWINNER vs

ZafafiAthoor Al AlamRUNNER-UP

1 person compared this today

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, From Patiala or Vintage 1933?

Vintage 1933 takes 3 of 5 categories. From Patiala is rated 4.50/5 from 2 votes; Vintage 1933 is rated 4.20/5 from 10 votes. Choose From Patiala for a aldehydic and amber character. Wins on sillage & projection and value for money. Choose Vintage 1933 for a green and citrus character. Wins on longevity, note pyramid duration and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, day or night wear.

Which lasts longer, From Patiala or Vintage 1933?

Vintage 1933 lasts longest (Vintage 1933 68/100, From Patiala 60/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, From Patiala or Vintage 1933?

From Patiala projects furthest (From Patiala 75/100, Vintage 1933 50/100), based on community performance votes.

Do From Patiala and Vintage 1933 smell similar?

Clearly different: a 31% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share aldehydic and mossy accords. Common notes include Orange Blossom, Aldehydes, Oakmoss and Musk.