FRAGRANXE
Fragrance comparison

Laura Ashley No. 2 vs more slowly

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 7 ratings analysed
Some overlap
Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

Laura Ashley No. 2 takes 3 of 4 categories.

  • Laura Ashley No. 2

    Choose it for a aldehydic and citrus character. Wins on longevity, sillage & projection and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, day or night wear.

  • more slowly

    Choose it for a aldehydic and fresh character. Wins on value for money. Best in winter, daytime wear.

Laura Ashley No. 23/4
more slowly1/4
Ratings & consensus
Not scored
Community sentiment
Not scored
Longevity
Laura Ashley No. 2
Sillage & projection
Laura Ashley No. 2
Value for money
more slowly
Versatility
Not scored
Note pyramid (duration)
Not scored
Fragranxe ranking
Laura Ashley No. 2

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance
Laura Ashley No. 2Laura Ashley
more slowlyMullium
Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split
3.75/ 5 · 4 votes
Have 9%Had 17%Want 74%
4.00/ 5 · 3 votes
Have 26%Had 0%Want 74%
Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate
0%Love
75%Like
25%Ok
0%Dislike
0%Hate

4 votes · too few to score

0%Love
100%Like
0%Ok
0%Dislike
0%Hate

3 votes · too few to score

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores
⏱ Longevity80
〰 Sillage63
♥ Love / hate69
⏱ Longevity60
〰 Sillage50
♥ Love / hate75
Category winners

LongevityLaura Ashley No. 2

SillageLaura Ashley No. 2

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it
¤ Price value0
¤ Price value25
Category winnermore slowlyBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both
aldehydic100%
citrus92%
fresh84%
white floral77%
yellow floral69%
soapy61%
aldehydic100%
fresh92%
fruity84%
iris77%
rose69%
green61%
Scent match36%Some overlap · both aldehydic and fresh

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared
Top
AldehydesBergamotLily-of-the-ValleyMandarin OrangeJasmine
Heart
Ylang-YlangRoseBlack currant leafSandalwoodIris
Base
MuskVetiverTonka BeanPatchouliMyrrhLabdanum
Notes
AldehydesRoseLitchiBlack currant leafIris

No top / heart / base split published

InformationalShared notesAldehydes, Rose, Black currant leaf and Iris. Durations are only published for more slowly, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season
Spring100
Summer0
Fall100
Winter100
Day100
Night100
Spring0
Summer0
Fall0
Winter100
Day100
Night26
Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes
Men0
Unisex0
Women100
Men0
Unisex100
Women0
Work 40%Casual 36%Date 16%Party 8%
InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#52,496

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews1

Overall rank#57,825

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Category winnerLaura Ashley No. 2Higher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Laura Ashley No. 2 is a classic aldehydic fragrance for women, launched in 1979. It opens with a sharp burst of soapy aldehydes and bright bergamot, leading into a heart of ylang-ylang and rose. This vintage-leaning scent settles into a warm, powdery base of musk, vetiver, and patchouli, making it a reliable choice fo…

Reviews →

Mullium More Slowly delivers a crisp, sparkling introduction driven by fizzy aldehydes and sharp black currant leaf. It bites immediately. Sweet litchi nectar quickly cushions that initial sharp green sting. Within twenty minutes, the tartness recedes as a dewy pink rose and powdery iris step forward into the heart. Y…

Reviews →
InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Laura Ashley No. 2 or more slowly?

Laura Ashley No. 2 takes 3 of 4 categories. Laura Ashley No. 2 is rated 3.75/5 from 4 votes; more slowly is rated 4.00/5 from 3 votes. Choose Laura Ashley No. 2 for a aldehydic and citrus character. Wins on longevity, sillage & projection and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, day or night wear. Choose more slowly for a aldehydic and fresh character. Wins on value for money. Best in winter, daytime wear.

Which lasts longer, Laura Ashley No. 2 or more slowly?

Laura Ashley No. 2 lasts longest (Laura Ashley No. 2 80/100, more slowly 60/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, Laura Ashley No. 2 or more slowly?

Laura Ashley No. 2 projects furthest (Laura Ashley No. 2 63/100, more slowly 50/100), based on community performance votes.

Do Laura Ashley No. 2 and more slowly smell similar?

Some overlap: a 36% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share aldehydic and fresh accords. Common notes include Aldehydes, Rose, Black currant leaf and Iris.

Is Laura Ashley No. 2 or more slowly better for summer or winter?

Laura Ashley No. 2 suits day or night wear; more slowly suits daytime wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Laura Ashley No. 2 and more slowly?

Laura Ashley No. 2 has top notes of Aldehydes, Bergamot, Lily-of-the-Valley and Mandarin Orange, heart notes of Ylang-Ylang, Rose, Black currant leaf and Sandalwood, a base of Musk, Vetiver, Tonka Bean and Patchouli. more slowly features Aldehydes, Rose, Litchi, Black currant leaf and Iris.

Recent comparisons

Head-to-head activity from live history
Add to comparison

Find a fragrance