Skip to content
FRAGRANXE
Fragrance comparison

Library Visit vs Mark Cross Eau de Cologne

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 17 ratings analysed
Clearly different
Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

No clear winner: the 4 categories split 2–2.

  • Library Visit

    Choose it for a woody and musky character. Wins on longevity and sillage & projection. Best in fall, daytime wear.

  • Mark Cross Eau de Cologne

    Choose it for a amber and mossy character. Wins on value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in winter, evening wear.

Library Visit2/4
Mark Cross Eau de Cologne2/4
Ratings & consensus
Not scored
Community sentiment
Not scored
Longevity
Library Visit
Sillage & projection
Library Visit
Value for money
Mark Cross Eau de Cologne
Versatility
Not scored
Note pyramid (duration)
Not scored
Fragranxe ranking
Mark Cross Eau de Cologne

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance
Library VisitMGO Duftanker
Mark Cross Eau de CologneMark Cross
Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split
3.62/ 5 · 8 votes
Have 9%Had 2%Want 89%
4.89/ 5 · 9 votes
Have 52%Had 18%Want 30%
Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate
38%Love
13%Like
38%Ok
0%Dislike
13%Hate

8 votes · too few to score

89%Love
11%Like
0%Ok
0%Dislike
0%Hate

9 votes · too few to score

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores
⏱ Longevity80
〰 Sillage69
♥ Love / hate66
⏱ Longevity72
〰 Sillage63
♥ Love / hate97
Category winners

LongevityLibrary Visit

SillageLibrary Visit

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it
¤ Price value56
¤ Price value59
Category winnerMark Cross Eau de CologneBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both
woody100%
musky88%
powdery77%
animalic65%
leather53%
amber42%
amber100%
mossy86%
woody72%
earthy58%
tobacco44%
sweet30%
Scent match32%Clearly different · both woody and amber

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared
Top
LeatherCivetTobaccoHeliotrope
Heart
CedarWoody NotesSaffronOlibanumAmberLabdanum
Base
White MuskHimalayan CedarMuskSandalwoodSoapBenzoinOakmoss
Notes
AmberOakmossTobaccoWoody Notes

No top / heart / base split published

InformationalShared notesTobacco, Woody Notes, Amber and Oakmoss. Durations are only published for Mark Cross Eau de Cologne, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season
Spring33
Summer0
Fall100
Winter67
Day100
Night67
Spring57
Summer29
Fall71
Winter100
Day20
Night100
Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes
Men60
Unisex40
Women0
Men100
Unisex0
Women0
InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#64,558

PerfumerHans Georg Staudt

Launched—

Reviews0

Overall rank#21,119

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews5

Category winnerMark Cross Eau de CologneHigher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Library Visit is a dry, woody leather scent with tobacco, musk, powder, and a distinct animalic edge. It reads more like worn leather, old wood, incense, and soft soap than a cosy vanilla library fantasy. This suits experienced niche wearers who enjoy darker, textured compositions. It can feel strong, persistent, and…

Reviews →

Mark Cross Eau de Cologne is a dry, mossy woods fragrance anchored by tobacco and warm amber. First launched in 1978, the profile relies on a traditional blend of oakmoss and woody notes, giving it a sturdy, forest floor earthiness. Sweet amber balances the dried leaf aroma of tobacco, keeping the texture smooth rathe…

Reviews →
InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Recent comparisons

Head-to-head activity from live history

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Library Visit or Mark Cross Eau de Cologne?

No clear winner: the 4 categories split 2–2. Library Visit is rated 3.62/5 from 8 votes; Mark Cross Eau de Cologne is rated 4.89/5 from 9 votes. Choose Library Visit for a woody and musky character. Wins on longevity and sillage & projection. Best in fall, daytime wear. Choose Mark Cross Eau de Cologne for a amber and mossy character. Wins on value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in winter, evening wear.

Which lasts longer, Library Visit or Mark Cross Eau de Cologne?

Library Visit lasts longest (Library Visit 80/100, Mark Cross Eau de Cologne 72/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, Library Visit or Mark Cross Eau de Cologne?

Library Visit projects furthest (Library Visit 69/100, Mark Cross Eau de Cologne 63/100), based on community performance votes.

Do Library Visit and Mark Cross Eau de Cologne smell similar?

Clearly different: a 32% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share woody and amber accords. Common notes include Tobacco, Woody Notes, Amber and Oakmoss.

Is Library Visit or Mark Cross Eau de Cologne better for summer or winter?

Library Visit suits daytime wear; Mark Cross Eau de Cologne suits evening wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Library Visit and Mark Cross Eau de Cologne?

Library Visit has top notes of Leather, Civet, Tobacco and Heliotrope, heart notes of Cedar, Woody Notes, Saffron and Olibanum, a base of White Musk, Himalayan Cedar, Musk and Sandalwood. Mark Cross Eau de Cologne features Amber, Oakmoss, Tobacco and Woody Notes.

Add to comparison

Find a fragrance