Skip to content
FRAGRANXE
Fragrance comparison

Mark Cross Eau de Cologne vs Library Visit

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 17 ratings analysed
Clearly different
Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

No clear winner: the 4 categories split 2–2.

  • Mark Cross Eau de Cologne

    Choose it for a amber and mossy character. Wins on value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in winter, evening wear.

  • Library Visit

    Choose it for a woody and musky character. Wins on longevity and sillage & projection. Best in fall, daytime wear.

Mark Cross Eau de Cologne2/4
Library Visit2/4
Ratings & consensus
Not scored
Community sentiment
Not scored
Longevity
Library Visit
Sillage & projection
Library Visit
Value for money
Mark Cross Eau de Cologne
Versatility
Not scored
Note pyramid (duration)
Not scored
Fragranxe ranking
Mark Cross Eau de Cologne

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance
Mark Cross Eau de CologneMark Cross
Library VisitMGO Duftanker
Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split
4.89/ 5 · 9 votes
Have 52%Had 18%Want 30%
3.62/ 5 · 8 votes
Have 9%Had 2%Want 89%
Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate
89%Love
11%Like
0%Ok
0%Dislike
0%Hate

9 votes · too few to score

38%Love
13%Like
38%Ok
0%Dislike
13%Hate

8 votes · too few to score

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores
⏱ Longevity72
〰 Sillage63
♥ Love / hate97
⏱ Longevity80
〰 Sillage69
♥ Love / hate66
Category winners

LongevityLibrary Visit

SillageLibrary Visit

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it
¤ Price value59
¤ Price value56
Category winnerMark Cross Eau de CologneBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both
amber100%
mossy86%
woody72%
earthy58%
tobacco44%
sweet30%
woody100%
musky88%
powdery77%
animalic65%
leather53%
amber42%
Scent match32%Clearly different · both woody and amber

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared
Notes
AmberOakmossTobaccoWoody Notes

No top / heart / base split published

Top
LeatherCivetTobaccoHeliotrope
Heart
CedarWoody NotesSaffronOlibanumAmberLabdanum
Base
White MuskHimalayan CedarMuskSandalwoodSoapBenzoinOakmoss
InformationalShared notesAmber, Oakmoss, Tobacco and Woody Notes. Durations are only published for Mark Cross Eau de Cologne, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season
Spring57
Summer29
Fall71
Winter100
Day20
Night100
Spring33
Summer0
Fall100
Winter67
Day100
Night67
Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes
Men100
Unisex0
Women0
Men60
Unisex40
Women0
InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#21,119

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews5

Overall rank#64,558

PerfumerHans Georg Staudt

Launched—

Reviews0

Category winnerMark Cross Eau de CologneHigher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Mark Cross Eau de Cologne is a dry, mossy woods fragrance anchored by tobacco and warm amber. First launched in 1978, the profile relies on a traditional blend of oakmoss and woody notes, giving it a sturdy, forest floor earthiness. Sweet amber balances the dried leaf aroma of tobacco, keeping the texture smooth rathe…

Reviews →

Library Visit is a dry, woody leather scent with tobacco, musk, powder, and a distinct animalic edge. It reads more like worn leather, old wood, incense, and soft soap than a cosy vanilla library fantasy. This suits experienced niche wearers who enjoy darker, textured compositions. It can feel strong, persistent, and…

Reviews →
InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Recent comparisons

Head-to-head activity from live history

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Mark Cross Eau de Cologne or Library Visit?

No clear winner: the 4 categories split 2–2. Mark Cross Eau de Cologne is rated 4.89/5 from 9 votes; Library Visit is rated 3.62/5 from 8 votes. Choose Mark Cross Eau de Cologne for a amber and mossy character. Wins on value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in winter, evening wear. Choose Library Visit for a woody and musky character. Wins on longevity and sillage & projection. Best in fall, daytime wear.

Which lasts longer, Mark Cross Eau de Cologne or Library Visit?

Library Visit lasts longest (Library Visit 80/100, Mark Cross Eau de Cologne 72/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, Mark Cross Eau de Cologne or Library Visit?

Library Visit projects furthest (Library Visit 69/100, Mark Cross Eau de Cologne 63/100), based on community performance votes.

Do Mark Cross Eau de Cologne and Library Visit smell similar?

Clearly different: a 32% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share woody and amber accords. Common notes include Amber, Oakmoss, Tobacco and Woody Notes.

Is Mark Cross Eau de Cologne or Library Visit better for summer or winter?

Mark Cross Eau de Cologne suits evening wear; Library Visit suits daytime wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Mark Cross Eau de Cologne and Library Visit?

Mark Cross Eau de Cologne features Amber, Oakmoss, Tobacco and Woody Notes. Library Visit has top notes of Leather, Civet, Tobacco and Heliotrope, heart notes of Cedar, Woody Notes, Saffron and Olibanum, a base of White Musk, Himalayan Cedar, Musk and Sandalwood.

Add to comparison

Find a fragrance