Fragrance comparison

Milano Collection 2016 vs Eclat

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 19 Oct 2026 894 ratings analysed

Milano Collection 2016

Kanebo

3.502 votes

Rank #63,044 PowderyWoody

Full profile Similar & dupes

44%scent match

Some overlap

3 wins

Eclat

Oriflame

3.75892 votes

Rank #8,888 PowderyWhite Floral

Full profile Similar & dupes

Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

Eclat takes 3 of 4 categories.

Milano Collection 2016
Choose it for a powdery and woody character. Wins on longevity. Best in spring, daytime wear.
Eclat
Choose it for a powdery and white floral character. Wins on sillage & projection, value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in winter.

Milano Collection 20161/4

Eclat3/4

Ratings & consensus: Not scored
Community sentiment: Not scored
Longevity: Milano Collection 2016
Sillage & projection: Eclat
Value for money: Eclat
Versatility: Not scored
Note pyramid (duration): Not scored
Fragranxe ranking: Eclat

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance

Milano Collection 2016Kanebo

EclatOriflame

Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split

3.50/ 5 · 2 votes

Have 20%Had 20%Want 60%

3.75/ 5 · 892 votes

Have 31%Had 69%Want 0%

Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate

0%Love

50%Like

50%Ok

0%Dislike

0%Hate

2 votes · too few to score

16%Love

62%Like

4%Ok

17%Dislike

1%Hate

892 votes

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores

⏱ Longevity60

〰 Sillage50

♥ Love / hate63

⏱ Longevity57

〰 Sillage52

♥ Love / hate69

Category winners

LongevityMilano Collection 2016

SillageEclat

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it

¤ Price value25

¤ Price value69

Category winnerEclatBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both

powdery100%

woody92%

amber84%

iris77%

musky69%

rose61%

powdery100%

white floral92%

fruity84%

violet77%

woody69%

musky61%

Scent match44%Some overlap · both powdery, woody and musky

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared

Notes

RoseJasmineIrisWhite MuskAmberWoodsy Notes

No top / heart / base split published

Top

ApricotRaspberryCitrusesBlack Currant

Heart

LilyVioletRoseJasmineIris

Base

White MuskAmberVanillaCedarSandalwood

InformationalShared notesRose, Jasmine, Iris and White Musk. Note durations are not published for these fragrances, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season

Spring100

Summer0

Fall100

Winter100

Day100

Night–

Spring93

Summer0

Fall0

Winter100

Day–

Night–

Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes

Men0

Unisex0

Women100

Men2

Unisex3

Women94

InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#63,044

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Overall rank#8,888

PerfumerViolaine David

Launched—

Reviews27

Category winnerEclatHigher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Kanebo Milano Collection 2016 is a limited-edition floral woody musk designed for women. The perfume opens with a delicate rose note, moving into a soft heart of iris and jasmine. It settles into a base of clean white musk and warm amber. This fragrance is ideal for spring days and cozy indoor settings.

Reviews →

Oriflame Eclat opens with tart raspberry and bright citrus before settling into a soft heart of violet, lily, and iris. Base notes of white musk and sandalwood create a smooth, clean dry-down that sits close to the skin. It works best as an easy daily scent for cool spring mornings and professional office settings.

Reviews →

InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Milano Collection 2016 or Eclat?

Eclat takes 3 of 4 categories. Milano Collection 2016 is rated 3.50/5 from 2 votes; Eclat is rated 3.75/5 from 892 votes. Choose Milano Collection 2016 for a powdery and woody character. Wins on longevity. Best in spring, daytime wear. Choose Eclat for a powdery and white floral character. Wins on sillage & projection, value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in winter.

Which lasts longer, Milano Collection 2016 or Eclat?

Milano Collection 2016 lasts longest (Milano Collection 2016 60/100, Eclat 57/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, Milano Collection 2016 or Eclat?

Projection is very close: Eclat 52/100, Milano Collection 2016 50/100 for sillage.

Do Milano Collection 2016 and Eclat smell similar?

Some overlap: a 44% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share powdery, woody and musky accords. Common notes include Rose, Jasmine, Iris and White Musk.

Is Milano Collection 2016 or Eclat better for summer or winter?

Milano Collection 2016 suits daytime wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Milano Collection 2016 and Eclat?

Milano Collection 2016 features Rose, Jasmine, Iris, White Musk and Amber. Eclat has top notes of Apricot, Raspberry, Citruses and Black Currant, heart notes of Lily, Violet, Rose and Jasmine, a base of White Musk, Amber, Vanilla and Cedar.