Fragrance comparison

Milano Collection 2016 vs Luna Park

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 19 Oct 2026 17 ratings analysed

Milano Collection 2016

Kanebo

3.502 votes

Rank #63,044 PowderyWoody

Full profile Similar & dupes

48%scent match

Some overlap

3 wins

Luna Park

Aquolina

4.2015 votes

Rank #18,386 PowderySweet

Full profile Similar & dupes

Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

Luna Park takes 3 of 4 categories.

Milano Collection 2016
Choose it for a powdery and woody character. Best in spring, daytime wear.
Luna Park
Choose it for a powdery and sweet character. Wins on sillage & projection, value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, daytime wear.

Milano Collection 20160/4

Luna Park3/4

Ratings & consensus: Not scored
Community sentiment: Not scored
Longevity: Tie
Sillage & projection: Luna Park
Value for money: Luna Park
Versatility: Not scored
Note pyramid (duration): Not scored
Fragranxe ranking: Luna Park

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance

Milano Collection 2016Kanebo

Luna ParkAquolina

Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split

3.50/ 5 · 2 votes

Have 20%Had 20%Want 60%

4.20/ 5 · 15 votes

Have 1%Had 1%Want 98%

Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate

0%Love

50%Like

50%Ok

0%Dislike

0%Hate

2 votes · too few to score

33%Love

60%Like

0%Ok

7%Dislike

0%Hate

15 votes · too few to score

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores

⏱ Longevity60

〰 Sillage50

♥ Love / hate63

⏱ Longevity60

〰 Sillage70

♥ Love / hate80

Category winners

LongevityTie

SillageLuna Park

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it

¤ Price value25

¤ Price value69

Category winnerLuna ParkBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both

powdery100%

woody92%

amber84%

iris77%

musky69%

rose61%

powdery100%

sweet92%

citrus84%

musky77%

white floral69%

iris61%

Scent match48%Some overlap · both powdery, musky and iris

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared

Notes

RoseJasmineIrisWhite MuskAmberWoodsy Notes

No top / heart / base split published

Top

LemonBlack currant leafRose

Heart

IrisJasmineRaspberry Bloom

Base

MarshmallowWhite MuskAmberOrange Blossom

InformationalShared notesRose, Jasmine, Iris and White Musk. Note durations are not published for these fragrances, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season

Spring100

Summer0

Fall100

Winter100

Day100

Night–

Spring100

Summer44

Fall44

Winter44

Day100

Night67

Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes

Men0

Unisex0

Women100

Men0

Unisex17

Women83

InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#63,044

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Overall rank#18,386

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews20

Category winnerLuna ParkHigher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Kanebo Milano Collection 2016 is a limited-edition floral woody musk designed for women. The perfume opens with a delicate rose note, moving into a soft heart of iris and jasmine. It settles into a base of clean white musk and warm amber. This fragrance is ideal for spring days and cozy indoor settings.

Reviews →

Aquolina Luna Park opens with bright candied lemon peel, sharp black currant leaf, and a quick flash of fresh rose. The citrus top fizzes softly before yielding to a floral heart of powdery iris, jasmine, and sweet raspberry bloom, creating a light candy atmosphere on skin. As the fragrance settles into its base afte…

Reviews →

InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Milano Collection 2016 or Luna Park?

Luna Park takes 3 of 4 categories. Milano Collection 2016 is rated 3.50/5 from 2 votes; Luna Park is rated 4.20/5 from 15 votes. Choose Milano Collection 2016 for a powdery and woody character. Best in spring, daytime wear. Choose Luna Park for a powdery and sweet character. Wins on sillage & projection, value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, daytime wear.

Which lasts longer, Milano Collection 2016 or Luna Park?

They last about the same: Milano Collection 2016 60/100, Luna Park 60/100 for longevity in community votes.

Which projects more, Milano Collection 2016 or Luna Park?

Luna Park projects furthest (Luna Park 70/100, Milano Collection 2016 50/100), based on community performance votes.

Do Milano Collection 2016 and Luna Park smell similar?

Some overlap: a 48% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share powdery, musky and iris accords. Common notes include Rose, Jasmine, Iris and White Musk.

Is Milano Collection 2016 or Luna Park better for summer or winter?

Milano Collection 2016 suits daytime wear; Luna Park suits daytime wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Milano Collection 2016 and Luna Park?

Milano Collection 2016 features Rose, Jasmine, Iris, White Musk and Amber. Luna Park has top notes of Lemon, Black currant leaf and Rose, heart notes of Iris, Jasmine and Raspberry Bloom, a base of Marshmallow, White Musk, Amber and Orange Blossom.