Fragrance comparison

Milano Collection 2016 vs Milano Collection 2019

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 19 Oct 2026 5 ratings analysed

2 wins

Milano Collection 2016

Kanebo

3.502 votes

Rank #63,044 PowderyWoody

Full profile Similar & dupes

58%scent match

Closely related

Milano Collection 2019

Kanebo

3.003 votes

Rank #64,902 RoseAmber

Full profile Similar & dupes

Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

Milano Collection 2016 takes 2 of 4 categories.

Milano Collection 2016
Choose it for a powdery and woody character. Wins on longevity and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, daytime wear.
Milano Collection 2019
Choose it for a rose and amber character. Wins on sillage & projection. Best in spring, daytime wear.

Milano Collection 20162/4

Milano Collection 20191/4

Ratings & consensus: Not scored
Community sentiment: Not scored
Longevity: Milano Collection 2016
Sillage & projection: Milano Collection 2019
Value for money: Tie
Versatility: Not scored
Note pyramid (duration): Not scored
Fragranxe ranking: Milano Collection 2016

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance

Milano Collection 2016Kanebo

Milano Collection 2019Kanebo

Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split

3.50/ 5 · 2 votes

Have 20%Had 20%Want 60%

3.00/ 5 · 3 votes

Have 3%Had 3%Want 94%

Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate

0%Love

50%Like

50%Ok

0%Dislike

0%Hate

2 votes · too few to score

0%Love

33%Like

33%Ok

33%Dislike

0%Hate

3 votes · too few to score

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores

⏱ Longevity60

〰 Sillage50

♥ Love / hate63

⏱ Longevity40

〰 Sillage63

♥ Love / hate50

Category winners

LongevityMilano Collection 2016

SillageMilano Collection 2019

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it

¤ Price value25

Category winnerTieBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both

powdery100%

woody92%

amber84%

iris77%

musky69%

rose61%

rose100%

amber92%

fruity84%

powdery77%

musky69%

sweet61%

Scent match58%Closely related · both powdery, amber and rose

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared

Notes

RoseJasmineIrisWhite MuskAmberWoodsy Notes

No top / heart / base split published

Top

PearGreen TeaLemon

Heart

RosePeachJasmineIris

Base

AmberWhite MuskCedar

InformationalShared notesRose, Jasmine, Iris and White Musk. Note durations are not published for these fragrances, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season

Spring100

Summer0

Fall100

Winter100

Day100

Night–

Spring100

Summer100

Fall0

Winter0

Day100

Night–

Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes

Men0

Unisex0

Women100

Men0

Unisex0

Women100

InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#63,044

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Overall rank#64,902

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Category winnerMilano Collection 2016Higher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Kanebo Milano Collection 2016 is a limited-edition floral woody musk designed for women. The perfume opens with a delicate rose note, moving into a soft heart of iris and jasmine. It settles into a base of clean white musk and warm amber. This fragrance is ideal for spring days and cozy indoor settings.

Reviews →

Kanebo Milano Collection 2019 offers a soft veil of powdery rose and fresh pear. Designed as a clean skin scent, it hugs the body with a quiet blend of green tea and white musk. It works beautifully for warm spring mornings when you want a clean, soap-like presence without heavy projection.

Reviews →

InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Milano Collection 2016 or Milano Collection 2019?

Milano Collection 2016 takes 2 of 4 categories. Milano Collection 2016 is rated 3.50/5 from 2 votes; Milano Collection 2019 is rated 3.00/5 from 3 votes. Choose Milano Collection 2016 for a powdery and woody character. Wins on longevity and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, daytime wear. Choose Milano Collection 2019 for a rose and amber character. Wins on sillage & projection. Best in spring, daytime wear.

Which lasts longer, Milano Collection 2016 or Milano Collection 2019?

Milano Collection 2016 lasts longest (Milano Collection 2016 60/100, Milano Collection 2019 40/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, Milano Collection 2016 or Milano Collection 2019?

Milano Collection 2019 projects furthest (Milano Collection 2019 63/100, Milano Collection 2016 50/100), based on community performance votes.

Do Milano Collection 2016 and Milano Collection 2019 smell similar?

Closely related: a 58% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share powdery, amber and rose accords. Common notes include Rose, Jasmine, Iris and White Musk.

Is Milano Collection 2016 or Milano Collection 2019 better for summer or winter?

Milano Collection 2016 suits daytime wear; Milano Collection 2019 suits daytime wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Milano Collection 2016 and Milano Collection 2019?

Milano Collection 2016 features Rose, Jasmine, Iris, White Musk and Amber. Milano Collection 2019 has top notes of Pear, Green Tea and Lemon, heart notes of Rose, Peach, Jasmine and Iris, a base of Amber, White Musk and Cedar.