Fragrance comparison

Milano Collection 2016 vs Tupai Love

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 19 Oct 2026 60 ratings analysed

Milano Collection 2016

Kanebo

3.502 votes

Rank #63,044 PowderyWoody

Full profile Similar & dupes

33%scent match

Clearly different

4 wins

Tupai Love

Blend Oud

3.7658 votes

Rank #17,287 AromaticPowdery

Full profile Similar & dupes

Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

Tupai Love takes 4 of 4 categories.

Milano Collection 2016
Choose it for a powdery and woody character. Best in spring, daytime wear.
Tupai Love
Choose it for a aromatic and powdery character. Wins on longevity, sillage & projection and value for money. Best in spring, daytime wear.

Milano Collection 20160/4

Tupai Love4/4

Ratings & consensus: Not scored
Community sentiment: Not scored
Longevity: Tupai Love
Sillage & projection: Tupai Love
Value for money: Tupai Love
Versatility: Not scored
Note pyramid (duration): Not scored
Fragranxe ranking: Tupai Love

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance

Milano Collection 2016Kanebo

Tupai LoveBlend Oud

Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split

3.50/ 5 · 2 votes

Have 20%Had 20%Want 60%

3.76/ 5 · 58 votes

Have 40%Had 11%Want 49%

Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate

0%Love

50%Like

50%Ok

0%Dislike

0%Hate

2 votes · too few to score

31%Love

38%Like

12%Ok

14%Dislike

5%Hate

58 votes

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores

⏱ Longevity60

〰 Sillage50

♥ Love / hate63

⏱ Longevity70

〰 Sillage62

♥ Love / hate69

Category winners

LongevityTupai Love

SillageTupai Love

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it

¤ Price value25

¤ Price value50

Category winnerTupai LoveBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both

powdery100%

woody92%

amber84%

iris77%

musky69%

rose61%

aromatic100%

powdery92%

white floral84%

herbal77%

vanilla69%

musky61%

Scent match33%Clearly different · both powdery and musky

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared

Notes

RoseJasmineIrisWhite MuskAmberWoodsy Notes

No top / heart / base split published

Top

JasmineCitrus and Floral Notes

Heart

ArtemisiaIrisRoseBlack Pepper

Base

White MuskVanillaelemiAmberTonka BeanVetiverPatchouliCedar

InformationalShared notesRose, Jasmine, Iris and White Musk. Note durations are not published for these fragrances, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season

Spring100

Summer0

Fall100

Winter100

Day100

Night–

Spring100

Summer71

Fall100

Winter57

Day100

Night87

Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes

Men0

Unisex0

Women100

Men4

Unisex36

Women60

InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#63,044

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Overall rank#17,287

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews6

Category winnerTupai LoveHigher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Kanebo Milano Collection 2016 is a limited-edition floral woody musk designed for women. The perfume opens with a delicate rose note, moving into a soft heart of iris and jasmine. It settles into a base of clean white musk and warm amber. This fragrance is ideal for spring days and cozy indoor settings.

Reviews →

Tupai Love by Blend Oud opens with crisp citrus and sweet jasmine, offering a clean floral opening that quickly shifts. Within twenty minutes, herbal artemisia and earthy iris surface alongside black pepper, turning the initial sweetness into a textured, dry powder. As the scent settles on skin, warm amber, resinous e…

Reviews →

InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Milano Collection 2016 or Tupai Love?

Tupai Love takes 4 of 4 categories. Milano Collection 2016 is rated 3.50/5 from 2 votes; Tupai Love is rated 3.76/5 from 58 votes. Choose Milano Collection 2016 for a powdery and woody character. Best in spring, daytime wear. Choose Tupai Love for a aromatic and powdery character. Wins on longevity, sillage & projection and value for money. Best in spring, daytime wear.

Which lasts longer, Milano Collection 2016 or Tupai Love?

Tupai Love lasts longest (Tupai Love 70/100, Milano Collection 2016 60/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, Milano Collection 2016 or Tupai Love?

Tupai Love projects furthest (Tupai Love 62/100, Milano Collection 2016 50/100), based on community performance votes.

Do Milano Collection 2016 and Tupai Love smell similar?

Clearly different: a 33% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share powdery and musky accords. Common notes include Rose, Jasmine, Iris and White Musk.

Is Milano Collection 2016 or Tupai Love better for summer or winter?

Milano Collection 2016 suits daytime wear; Tupai Love suits daytime wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Milano Collection 2016 and Tupai Love?

Milano Collection 2016 features Rose, Jasmine, Iris, White Musk and Amber. Tupai Love has top notes of Jasmine and Citrus and Floral Notes, heart notes of Artemisia, Iris, Rose and Black Pepper, a base of White Musk, Vanilla, elemi and Amber.