Skip to content
FRAGRANXE
Fragrance comparison

Shocking vs Cleopatra

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 350 ratings analysed
Clearly different
Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

Shocking takes 3 of 4 categories.

  • Shocking

    Choose it for a musky and powdery character. Wins on longevity, sillage & projection and fragranxe ranking. Best in winter.

  • Cleopatra

    Choose it for a woody and amber character. Wins on value for money. Best in winter, evening wear.

Shocking3/4
Cleopatra1/4
Ratings & consensus
Not scored
Community sentiment
Not scored
Longevity
Shocking
Sillage & projection
Shocking
Value for money
Cleopatra
Versatility
Not scored
Note pyramid (duration)
Not scored
Fragranxe ranking
Shocking

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance
ShockingSchiaparelli
CleopatraKesma
Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split
3.40/ 5 · 348 votes
Have 79%Had 21%Want 0%
4.50/ 5 · 2 votes
Have 36%Had 9%Want 55%
Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate
57%Love
29%Like
3%Ok
11%Dislike
1%Hate

343 votes

50%Love
50%Like
0%Ok
0%Dislike
0%Hate

2 votes · too few to score

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores
⏱ Longevity77
〰 Sillage71
♥ Love / hate82
⏱ Longevity60
〰 Sillage50
♥ Love / hate88
Category winners

LongevityShocking

SillageShocking

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it
¤ Price value45
¤ Price value50
Category winnerCleopatraBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both
musky100%
powdery92%
animalic84%
honey77%
yellow floral69%
woody61%
woody100%
amber92%
warm spicy84%
green77%
white floral69%
powdery61%
Scent match28%Clearly different · both woody and powdery

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared
Top
AldehydesTarragonBergamot
Heart
White HoneyNarcissusJasmineRoseYlang-Ylang
Base
CivettaMuskSandalwoodAmberClovePatchouli
Top
BergamotCinnamonGalbanumPepperCloves
Heart
Orange BlossomYlang-YlangHeliotropeNarcissusTuberoseJasmineHoneyClove
Base
SandalwoodPatchouliLabdanumWormwoodOakmossLeatherVetiverIncense
InformationalShared notesBergamot, Narcissus, Jasmine and Ylang-Ylang. Note durations are not published for these fragrances, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season
Spring45
Summer0
Fall0
Winter100
Day–
Night–
Spring0
Summer0
Fall50
Winter100
Day–
Night100
Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes
Men0
Unisex34
Women66
Men0
Unisex0
Women100
InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#1,281

PerfumerJean Carles

Launched—

Reviews105

Overall rank#57,423

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Category winnerShockingHigher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Shocking by Schiaparelli is a bold oriental floral from 1937 that defines vintage glamour. It features a sharp opening of aldehydes and tarragon that settles into a rich, honeyed floral heart. The base remains warm and deeply animalic, making it a daring choice for formal evening events or cold autumn nights where you…

Reviews →

Cleopatra by Kesma is a dense, unapologetic oriental floral from 1983. It opens with a punch of cloves and cinnamon before settling into a rich, resinous heart of tuberose, ylang-ylang, and honey. This is a cold-weather classic that leans heavily on its base of incense, leather, and oakmoss for a deep, vintage footpri…

Reviews →
InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Recent comparisons

Head-to-head activity from live history

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Shocking or Cleopatra?

Shocking takes 3 of 4 categories. Shocking is rated 3.40/5 from 348 votes; Cleopatra is rated 4.50/5 from 2 votes. Choose Shocking for a musky and powdery character. Wins on longevity, sillage & projection and fragranxe ranking. Best in winter. Choose Cleopatra for a woody and amber character. Wins on value for money. Best in winter, evening wear.

Which lasts longer, Shocking or Cleopatra?

Shocking lasts longest (Shocking 77/100, Cleopatra 60/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, Shocking or Cleopatra?

Shocking projects furthest (Shocking 71/100, Cleopatra 50/100), based on community performance votes.

Do Shocking and Cleopatra smell similar?

Clearly different: a 28% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share woody and powdery accords. Common notes include Bergamot, Narcissus, Jasmine and Ylang-Ylang.

Is Shocking or Cleopatra better for summer or winter?

Cleopatra suits evening wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Shocking and Cleopatra?

Shocking has top notes of Aldehydes, Tarragon and Bergamot, heart notes of White Honey, Narcissus, Jasmine and Rose, a base of Civetta, Musk, Sandalwood and Amber. Cleopatra has top notes of Bergamot, Cinnamon, Galbanum and Pepper, heart notes of Orange Blossom, Ylang-Ylang, Heliotrope and Narcissus, a base of Sandalwood, Patchouli, Labdanum and Wormwood.

Add to comparison

Find a fragrance