Skip to content
FRAGRANXE
Fragrance comparison

Tempting Nashi vs 1932 Eau de Parfum

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 775 ratings analysed
Some overlap
Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

No clear winner: the 5 categories split 2–2.

  • Tempting Nashi

    Choose it for a floral and fruity character. Wins on longevity and value for money. Best in spring, daytime wear.

  • 1932 Eau de Parfum

    Choose it for a floral and aldehydic character. Wins on ratings & consensus and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, daytime wear.

Tempting Nashi2/5
1932 Eau de Parfum2/5
Ratings & consensus
1932 Eau de Parfum
Community sentiment
Not scored
Longevity
Tempting Nashi
Sillage & projection
Tie
Value for money
Tempting Nashi
Versatility
Not scored
Note pyramid (duration)
Not scored
Fragranxe ranking
1932 Eau de Parfum

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance
Tempting NashiSpring
1932 Eau de ParfumChanel
Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split
3.88/ 5 · 24 votes
Have 46%Had 10%Want 45%
4.07/ 5 · 751 votes
Have 75%Had 25%Want 0%
Category winner1932 Eau de ParfumRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate
50%Love
25%Like
0%Ok
13%Dislike
13%Hate

24 votes · too few to score

38%Love
42%Like
11%Ok
7%Dislike
2%Hate

751 votes

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores
⏱ Longevity64
〰 Sillage57
♥ Love / hate72
⏱ Longevity62
〰 Sillage57
♥ Love / hate77
Category winners

LongevityTempting Nashi

SillageTie

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it
¤ Price value73
¤ Price value29
Category winnerTempting NashiBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both
floral100%
fruity88%
citrus77%
sweet65%
aquatic53%
fresh42%
floral100%
aldehydic92%
iris84%
fresh77%
powdery69%
woody61%
Scent match37%Some overlap · both floral and fresh

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared
Notes
PearFloral NotesGrapefruitMusk

No top / heart / base split published

Top20-30 mins
AldehydesPearGrapefruit
Heart2-4 hrs
IrisFloral NotesJasmine
Base6-8 hrs
MuskWoody NotesVetiverVanilaIncense
InformationalShared notesPear, Floral Notes, Grapefruit and Musk. Durations are only published for 1932 Eau de Parfum, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season
Spring100
Summer85
Fall62
Winter23
Day100
Night27
Spring100
Summer73
Fall0
Winter47
Day100
Night41
Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes
Men15
Unisex8
Women77
Men1
Unisex18
Women80
InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#47,122

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Overall rank#30,244

PerfumerJacques Polge

Launched—

Reviews0

Category winner1932 Eau de ParfumHigher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Tempting Nashi by Spring opens with a burst of chilled, juicy nashi pear and bright grapefruit, delivering an immediate splash of crisp orchard sweetness. As it settles, airy floral notes float over a bed of clean, sheer musk, giving off the feeling of fresh morning air and crisp cotton. It is an uncomplicated, uplift…

Reviews →

Chanel 1932 Eau de Parfum opens with crisp aldehydes and juicy sliced pear. The sparkle hits fast. Within fifteen minutes, the citrus bite softens into cool, powdery iris root and pale jasmine petals. It feels clean, tailored, and airy on skin. The base relies on soft white musk, dry vetiver, and a faint ribbon of smo…

Reviews →
InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Recent comparisons

Head-to-head activity from live history

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Tempting Nashi or 1932 Eau de Parfum?

No clear winner: the 5 categories split 2–2. Tempting Nashi is rated 3.88/5 from 24 votes; 1932 Eau de Parfum is rated 4.07/5 from 751 votes. Choose Tempting Nashi for a floral and fruity character. Wins on longevity and value for money. Best in spring, daytime wear. Choose 1932 Eau de Parfum for a floral and aldehydic character. Wins on ratings & consensus and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, daytime wear.

Which lasts longer, Tempting Nashi or 1932 Eau de Parfum?

They last about the same: Tempting Nashi 64/100, 1932 Eau de Parfum 62/100 for longevity in community votes.

Which projects more, Tempting Nashi or 1932 Eau de Parfum?

Projection is very close: Tempting Nashi 57/100, 1932 Eau de Parfum 57/100 for sillage.

Do Tempting Nashi and 1932 Eau de Parfum smell similar?

Some overlap: a 37% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share floral and fresh accords. Common notes include Pear, Floral Notes, Grapefruit and Musk.

Is Tempting Nashi or 1932 Eau de Parfum better for summer or winter?

Tempting Nashi suits daytime wear; 1932 Eau de Parfum suits daytime wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Tempting Nashi and 1932 Eau de Parfum?

Tempting Nashi features Pear, Floral Notes, Grapefruit and Musk. 1932 Eau de Parfum has top notes of Aldehydes, Pear and Grapefruit, heart notes of Iris, Floral Notes and Jasmine, a base of Musk, Woody Notes, Vetiver and Vanila.

Add to comparison

Find a fragrance