Skip to content
FRAGRANXE
Fragrance comparison

Throwback O2 vs Inimaginable Lótus

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 19 ratings analysed
Some overlap
Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

No clear winner: the 4 categories split 2–2.

  • Throwback O2

    Choose it for a floral and citrus character. Wins on value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, daytime wear.

  • Inimaginable Lótus

    Choose it for a floral and white floral character. Wins on longevity and sillage & projection. Best in spring, evening wear.

Throwback O22/4
Inimaginable Lótus2/4
Ratings & consensus
Not scored
Community sentiment
Not scored
Longevity
Inimaginable Lótus
Sillage & projection
Inimaginable Lótus
Value for money
Throwback O2
Versatility
Not scored
Note pyramid (duration)
Not scored
Fragranxe ranking
Throwback O2

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance
Throwback O2Impulse
Inimaginable LótusAtelier Segall & Barutti
Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split
4.14/ 5 · 14 votes
Have 39%Had 25%Want 36%
4.00/ 5 · 5 votes
Have 29%Had 7%Want 64%
Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate
57%Love
14%Like
14%Ok
14%Dislike
0%Hate

14 votes · too few to score

40%Love
40%Like
0%Ok
20%Dislike
0%Hate

5 votes · too few to score

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores
⏱ Longevity48
〰 Sillage38
♥ Love / hate79
⏱ Longevity75
〰 Sillage69
♥ Love / hate75
Category winners

LongevityInimaginable Lótus

SillageInimaginable Lótus

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it
¤ Price value89
¤ Price value75
Category winnerThrowback O2Best value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both
floral100%
citrus83%
aquatic65%
fresh48%
green30%
floral100%
white floral92%
aquatic84%
fresh77%
fruity69%
woody61%
Scent match52%Some overlap · both floral, aquatic and fresh

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared
Top
Green NotesBergamotLemon
Heart
Water LilyFreesiaJasmine
Base
CedarwoodAmberMusk
Top
LotusSpicesOily Notes
Heart
JasmineBergamotHoneysucklePineappleLemonWhite FlowersFreesiaMint
Base
Blue LotusWater LilyAmberMuskWoodsy NotesCedar
InformationalShared notesBergamot, Lemon, Water Lily and Freesia. Note durations are not published for these fragrances, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season
Spring100
Summer100
Fall33
Winter33
Day100
Night33
Spring100
Summer50
Fall100
Winter50
Day50
Night100
Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes
Men0
Unisex20
Women80
Men0
Unisex75
Women25
InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#35,585

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews4

Overall rank#61,961

PerfumerTzivia Segall

Launched—

Reviews0

Category winnerThrowback O2Higher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

A bright, nostalgic floral body spray with a fizzy lemon and green opening, then a watery heart of freesia, water lily, and jasmine. Throwback O2 reads fresh, summery, and easy to wear, with a soft musky amber dry-down. It suits shoppers who like light citrus florals and 90s-style freshness more than rich perfume dept…

Reviews →

Inimaginable Lótus opens with a flash of watery lotus, crushed mint, and a peculiar slick top note that feels almost medicinal before softening. White petals of jasmine and lily-of-the-valley push through the cool aquatic surface, grounded by damp cedar and clear musk. It suits spring mornings and humid summer days wh…

Reviews →
InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Recent comparisons

Head-to-head activity from live history

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Throwback O2 or Inimaginable Lótus?

No clear winner: the 4 categories split 2–2. Throwback O2 is rated 4.14/5 from 14 votes; Inimaginable Lótus is rated 4.00/5 from 5 votes. Choose Throwback O2 for a floral and citrus character. Wins on value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, daytime wear. Choose Inimaginable Lótus for a floral and white floral character. Wins on longevity and sillage & projection. Best in spring, evening wear.

Which lasts longer, Throwback O2 or Inimaginable Lótus?

Inimaginable Lótus lasts longest (Inimaginable Lótus 75/100, Throwback O2 48/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, Throwback O2 or Inimaginable Lótus?

Inimaginable Lótus projects furthest (Inimaginable Lótus 69/100, Throwback O2 38/100), based on community performance votes.

Do Throwback O2 and Inimaginable Lótus smell similar?

Some overlap: a 52% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share floral, aquatic and fresh accords. Common notes include Bergamot, Lemon, Water Lily and Freesia.

Is Throwback O2 or Inimaginable Lótus better for summer or winter?

Throwback O2 suits daytime wear; Inimaginable Lótus suits evening wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Throwback O2 and Inimaginable Lótus?

Throwback O2 has top notes of Green Notes, Bergamot and Lemon, heart notes of Water Lily, Freesia and Jasmine, a base of Cedarwood, Amber and Musk. Inimaginable Lótus has top notes of Lotus, Spices and Oily Notes, heart notes of Jasmine, Bergamot, Honeysuckle and Pineapple, a base of Blue Lotus, Water Lily, Amber and Musk.

Add to comparison

Find a fragrance