Fragrance comparison

Tiffany & Co Wild Iris vs Blanc de Paris

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 10 Oct 2026 41 ratings analysed

Tiffany & Co Wild Iris

Tiffany

3.009 votes

Rank #58,598 IrisPowdery

Full profile Similar & dupes

45%scent match

Some overlap

Blanc de Paris

Scent on Canvas

3.9032 votes

Rank #18,634 CitrusWhite Floral

Full profile Similar & dupes

Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

No clear winner: the 4 categories split 2–2.

Tiffany & Co Wild Iris
Choose it for a iris and powdery character. Wins on longevity and sillage & projection. Best in spring, daytime wear.
Blanc de Paris
Choose it for a citrus and white floral character. Wins on value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in summer, daytime wear.

Tiffany & Co Wild Iris2/4

Blanc de Paris2/4

Ratings & consensus: Not scored
Community sentiment: Not scored
Longevity: Tiffany & Co Wild Iris
Sillage & projection: Tiffany & Co Wild Iris
Value for money: Blanc de Paris
Versatility: Not scored
Note pyramid (duration): Not scored
Fragranxe ranking: Blanc de Paris

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance

Tiffany & Co Wild IrisTiffany

Blanc de ParisScent on Canvas

Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split

3.00/ 5 · 9 votes

Have 5%Had 2%Want 93%

3.90/ 5 · 32 votes

Have 22%Had 7%Want 70%

Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate

33%Love

22%Like

0%Ok

0%Dislike

44%Hate

9 votes · too few to score

26%Love

63%Like

0%Ok

11%Dislike

0%Hate

19 votes · too few to score

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores

⏱ Longevity69

〰 Sillage71

♥ Love / hate50

⏱ Longevity65

〰 Sillage49

♥ Love / hate78

Category winners

LongevityTiffany & Co Wild Iris

SillageTiffany & Co Wild Iris

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it

¤ Price value4

¤ Price value38

Category winnerBlanc de ParisBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both

iris100%

powdery83%

violet65%

citrus48%

earthy30%

citrus100%

white floral90%

musky80%

powdery70%

woody60%

iris50%

Scent match45%Some overlap · both powdery, iris and citrus

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared

Top

Green Mandarin

Heart

Rose

Base

Iris

Top

CitronCalabrian bergamotGreen Mandarin

Heart

White FlowersIrisBulgarian Rose

Base

White MuskSandalwoodBenzoin

InformationalShared notesGreen Mandarin, Rose and Iris. Note durations are not published for these fragrances, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season

Spring100

Summer80

Fall60

Winter60

Day100

Night80

Spring71

Summer100

Fall43

Winter14

Day100

Night–

Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes

Men0

Unisex25

Women75

Men0

Unisex50

Women50

InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#58,598

PerfumerDaniela Andrier

Launched—

Reviews1

Overall rank#18,634

PerfumerBeatrice Aguilar

Launched—

Reviews25

Category winnerBlanc de ParisHigher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Tiffany & Co Wild Iris is a soft, powdery floral built around iris, with a bright green mandarin opening and a gentle rose heart. It reads polished, airy, and slightly vintage in texture rather than lush or sugary. This is the kind of scent that may suit someone who likes clean iris and makeup-powder elegance. The mai…

Reviews →

Blanc de Paris by Scent on Canvas is a clean, modern floral musk designed for daily wear. It opens with a bright burst of citron and green mandarin, settling into a heart of white flowers and iris. The dry-down relies on white musk and sandalwood to maintain its squeaky-clean, luminous feel. It excels as a fresh, easy…

Reviews →

InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Tiffany & Co Wild Iris or Blanc de Paris?

No clear winner: the 4 categories split 2–2. Tiffany & Co Wild Iris is rated 3.00/5 from 9 votes; Blanc de Paris is rated 3.90/5 from 32 votes. Choose Tiffany & Co Wild Iris for a iris and powdery character. Wins on longevity and sillage & projection. Best in spring, daytime wear. Choose Blanc de Paris for a citrus and white floral character. Wins on value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in summer, daytime wear.

Which lasts longer, Tiffany & Co Wild Iris or Blanc de Paris?

Tiffany & Co Wild Iris lasts longest (Tiffany & Co Wild Iris 69/100, Blanc de Paris 65/100), based on community performance votes.

Which projects more, Tiffany & Co Wild Iris or Blanc de Paris?

Tiffany & Co Wild Iris projects furthest (Tiffany & Co Wild Iris 71/100, Blanc de Paris 49/100), based on community performance votes.

Do Tiffany & Co Wild Iris and Blanc de Paris smell similar?

Some overlap: a 45% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share powdery, iris and citrus accords. Common notes include Green Mandarin, Rose and Iris.

Is Tiffany & Co Wild Iris or Blanc de Paris better for summer or winter?

Tiffany & Co Wild Iris suits daytime wear; Blanc de Paris suits daytime wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Tiffany & Co Wild Iris and Blanc de Paris?

Tiffany & Co Wild Iris has top notes of Green Mandarin, heart notes of Rose, a base of Iris. Blanc de Paris has top notes of Citron, Calabrian bergamot and Green Mandarin, heart notes of White Flowers, Iris and Bulgarian Rose, a base of White Musk, Sandalwood and Benzoin.