Fragrance comparison

Turquatic vs Cyberst@r

Notes, accords, longevity, sillage, seasons and community ratings, side by side.

Updated 15 Nov 2026 1,214 ratings analysed

3 wins

Turquatic

MAC · 2005

4.161,209 votes

Rank #1,195 FloralWoody

Full profile Similar & dupes

45%scent match

Some overlap

Cyberst@r

Valeria Mazza

2.205 votes

Rank #76,349 CitrusFloral

Full profile Similar & dupes

Quick verdict

Which one should you pick?

Turquatic takes 3 of 3 categories.

Turquatic
Choose it for a floral and woody character. Wins on sillage & projection, value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, daytime wear.
Cyberst@r
Choose it for a citrus and floral character. Best in summer, daytime wear.

Turquatic3/3

Cyberst@r0/3

Ratings & consensus: Not scored
Community sentiment: Not scored
Longevity: Not scored
Sillage & projection: Turquatic
Value for money: Turquatic
Versatility: Not scored
Note pyramid (duration): Not scored
Fragranxe ranking: Turquatic

Head-to-head breakdown

Every category side by side, with the winner called out.

Fragrance

TurquaticMAC

Cyberst@rValeria Mazza

Winner

Ratings & consensus

Average rating and ownership split

4.16/ 5 · 1,209 votes

Have 79%Had 21%Want 0%

2.20/ 5 · 5 votes

Have 13%Had 13%Want 75%

Category winnerNot enough dataRating weighted by vote count

Community sentiment

How voters split from love to hate

48%Love

37%Like

8%Ok

6%Dislike

1%Hate

1,125 votes

0%Love

20%Like

0%Ok

60%Dislike

20%Hate

5 votes · too few to score

Category winnerNot enough dataMost positive mix (25+ votes)

Longevity & sillage

0–100 community performance scores

⏱ Longevity57

〰 Sillage51

♥ Love / hate82

⏱ LongevityN/A

〰 Sillage50

♥ Love / hate30

Category winners

LongevityNo data

SillageTurquatic

Value for money

How fairly priced voters find it

¤ Price value67

¤ Price value50

Category winnerTurquaticBest value score

Main accords

Strength of each scent family · outlined = shared by both

floral100%

woody90%

powdery80%

aquatic60%

citrus100%

floral92%

woody84%

white floral77%

powdery69%

green61%

Scent match45%Some overlap · both floral, woody and powdery

Note pyramid (duration)

Top, heart and base, with how long each lasts when known · gold = shared

Top

LotusOrris Root

Heart

CedarPoppy

Base

—

Top15-30 mins

BergamotGrapefruitAmalfi LemonOrangeMandarin OrangeBlackberryMelonGreen Notes

Heart2-4 hrs

JasmineYlang-YlangLotusFreesiaRoseLily-of-the-ValleyVioletMagnolia

Base4-6 hrs

MuskSandalwoodVirginia Cedar

InformationalShared notesLotus, Virginia Cedar and Amalfi Lemon. Durations are only published for Cyberst@r, so this is not scored.

Seasons & time of day

Relative to each fragrance's best season

Spring100

Summer0

Fall0

Winter15

Day100

Night32

Spring0

Summer100

Fall0

Winter0

Day100

Night–

Category winnerNot enough dataMost year-round

Who wears it

Gender appeal votes

Men3

Unisex42

Women54

Not enough votes yet

InformationalProfile onlyAudience is not scored

Ranking & credits

Fragranxe overall rank, nose and launch

Overall rank#1,195

PerfumerNot listed

Launched2005

Reviews192

Overall rank#76,349

PerfumerNot listed

Launched—

Reviews0

Category winnerTurquaticHigher overall rank

In a nutshell

Description & review snapshot

Designed for warm weather and daily routine sprays, MAC Turquatic blends watery lotus with powdery orris root and dry cedarwood. The scent sits close to the skin, offering a polite aquatic presence that never overpowers crowded rooms. It works as an easy daytime reach for hot outdoor events.

Reviews →

Cyberst@r by Valeria Mazza is a bright, nostalgic floral-fruity eau de parfum built around a sunny rush of citrus, watery florals, and soft wood. The opening hits with a crisp medley of tart grapefruit, juicy mandarin orange, and sweet melon, wrapped in brisk green leaves that instantly bring to mind the fresh optimis…

Reviews →

InformationalRead bothTaste is personal

How we score: ratings blend public fragrance ratings with Fragranxe member votes; longevity, sillage, value and sentiment are community vote scores, and season bars are relative to each fragrance's strongest season. Categories with too little data are shown but not scored. The scent match weighs accord overlap (60%) and shared notes (40%). More in the FAQ.

Recent comparisons

Head-to-head activity from live history

Saffron AmberIlluminumRUNNER-UP vs

Septieme Sens (7e Sens)Sonia RykielWINNER

1 person compared this today

Fancy NightsJessica SimpsonRUNNER-UP vs

Nino Cerruti Pour FemmeCerrutiWINNER

3 people compared this today

Sweet DreamsHouse Of SillageWINNER vs

Safari ElixirAthoor Al AlamRUNNER-UP

1 person compared this today

PrometheuNecalliWINNER vs

Bruno ImperialAnfar LondonRUNNER-UP

1 person compared this today

Common questions

Straight answers from the data above.

Which is better, Turquatic or Cyberst@r?

Turquatic takes 3 of 3 categories. Turquatic is rated 4.16/5 from 1,209 votes; Cyberst@r is rated 2.20/5 from 5 votes. Choose Turquatic for a floral and woody character. Wins on sillage & projection, value for money and fragranxe ranking. Best in spring, daytime wear. Choose Cyberst@r for a citrus and floral character. Best in summer, daytime wear.

Which projects more, Turquatic or Cyberst@r?

Projection is very close: Turquatic 51/100, Cyberst@r 50/100 for sillage.

Do Turquatic and Cyberst@r smell similar?

Some overlap: a 45% scent match on Fragranxe. Both share floral, woody and powdery accords. Common notes include Lotus, Virginia Cedar and Amalfi Lemon.

Is Turquatic or Cyberst@r better for summer or winter?

Turquatic suits daytime wear; Cyberst@r suits daytime wear. Based on community season votes.

What are the notes in Turquatic and Cyberst@r?

Turquatic has top notes of Lotus and Orris Root, heart notes of Cedar and Poppy. Cyberst@r has top notes of Bergamot, Grapefruit, Amalfi Lemon and Orange, heart notes of Jasmine, Ylang-Ylang, Lotus and Freesia, a base of Musk, Sandalwood and Virginia Cedar.