FRAGRANXE
Magic + Science by Thursday
0COMMUNITY BALANCE0
THURSDAYRANK #58,717 OVERALL

Magic + Science

★★★★★★★★★★
3.001 votes · 1 reviewsUNISEX

Magic + Science reads as a sweet, powdery violet fragrance with a tart cherry accent and a soft musky base. On skin it seems to open more bitter and floral than sugary, then settles into a Parma Violet style sweetness. Based on the limited review evidence, this is a better fit for someone who enjoys violet-forward scents more than a layered cherry.

Similar

Similar Suggestions

BETA

Performance Metrics

2 VOTES
LONGEVITY
0
Very weak
0 votes
SILLAGE
0
Intimate
0 votes
LOVE / HATE
50
Neutral
1 votes
PRICE VALUE
0
Way overpriced
0 votes
RR SCORE
36
Building evidence
1 votes
Ratings1
Reviews1
OVERALL23Building evidence2 votes
Open Performance Breakdown 1 TAKE

The limited wear evidence is better than the airy profile might suggest. One user reports over 6 hours of longevity and a noticeable scent bubble for around 3 to 4 hours. That points to moderate staying power with a solid early presence, though the sample size is far too small for hard claims.

Notes Pyramid

Search these notes
TOP
Not mapped
MIDDLE
Not mapped
BASE
Not mapped
UNCLASSIFIED NOTES

Choose where each note belongs.

Magic + Science reads as sweet, powdery, violet-heavy and gently musky, with tart cherry and candied fruit accents around the edges. The scent seems to open more bitter and floral than expected, then turns softer and slightly sweeter, giving a Parma Violet impression more than a juicy cherry one.

Main Accords

10 MAPPED
Sweet
Powdery
Cherry
Fruity
Musky
Violet
Warm Spicy
Aromatic
Nutty
Almond

The main accords seem to behave in a fairly direct way on skin. Sweetness and powderiness lead, while violet shapes the personality of the scent. Cherry and fruity tones appear more like supporting colour than the core theme. Musk smooths the dry-down, and the almond-nutty facets may add a faint cosmetic softness rather than true gourmand richness.

Community Data

27 TOTAL VOTES

COMMUNITY SENTIMENT

OWNERSHIP STATS

GENDER APPEAL

1votes

REVIEW SENTIMENT

100%positive
Positive1
Neutral0
Negative0

When to Wear

TAP TO VOTE

SEASONS · 3 VOTES

TIME OF DAY · TAP TO VOTE

OCCASIONS · TAP TO VOTE

It looks easiest to wear in spring and fall. The vote picture leans most toward daytime.

Pros & Cons

Quick take before you sample

WHY PEOPLE MAY LIKE IT

+

Distinctive violet-forward character

+

Powdery sweetness may appeal to Parma Violet fans

+

Noticeable opening presence

+

Reported wear is decent for the style

+

Unisex positioning with a soft floral tilt

+

Interesting choice if you want something less mainstream

+

Cherry adds some contrast to the floral core

WHAT TO WATCH OUT FOR

−

Likely too violet-led for cherry seekers

−

Can open bitter rather than playful

−

May feel linear on skin

−

Limited sense of depth in current review evidence

−

Not clearly gourmand despite the sweet notes

−

Old-fashioned candy-floral feel may divide opinion

−

Very limited public feedback so far

Fragranxe Review

EDITORIAL
“Thursday Magic + Science Review”

Magic + Science by Thursday is an unusual sweet violet scent with a tart fruity edge rather than a plush modern gourmand profile. The note list points toward sour cherry, cardamom, violet, musk and candied fruits, but the available wear impression suggests violet is the note that really leads the experience. If you are here for a bright cherry candy fragrance, this may not quite match that expectation.

The opening seems to lean bitter, powdery and floral, with the violet coming through strongly from the start. That gives it an old-fashioned confectionery feel, closer to Parma Violet sweets than to a glossy cherry syrup effect. The cherry and candied fruit ideas appear to support the composition more than dominate it. Instead of a juicy red-fruit burst, the fragrance seems to wear as a violet-centered scent with sweetness gradually building around it.

As it settles, the profile appears to soften and sweeten a little. This later stage sounds easier and more rounded than the opening, with the powdery floral tone still very much intact. Musk likely helps smooth the structure, while the fruity and almond-toned facets in the accord profile may add a faint cosmetic or sugared nuance. Even so, the evidence suggests the scent stays fairly singular in character rather than evolving into something deep or highly textured.

That is likely the main dividing line with Magic + Science. If you love violet fragrances that stay focused and readable, this simplicity may work in its favour. If you want obvious contrast between tart fruit, spice, sweetness and musk, it may feel too one-note. The strongest review we have is quite clear on this point, describing the fragrance as enjoyable in parts but lacking depth.

Performance looks respectable from the limited data. One wearer reports over 6 hours of longevity with a solid scent bubble for roughly 3 to 4 hours, which suggests it is not as airy or fleeting as the powdery profile might imply. Still, there is only one detailed wear report, so it is safer to read this as promising rather than proven across many skins.

For wearing style, Magic + Science looks best suited to someone who already knows they enjoy powdery violet scents and does not mind a slightly nostalgic candy-floral tone. It may suit cooler days, relaxed evenings, or personal wear better than loud social settings. Anyone chasing richness, complexity, or a more obviously candied cherry finish should sample first.

FRAGRANXE EDITORIAL

FAQs

What does Magic + Science smell like?+

It appears to smell mainly of powdery violet, sweet fruit, musk and a cherry nuance. The overall impression is soft, floral, slightly tart at first, then sweeter after a couple of hours.

Is Magic + Science more violet or cherry?+

From the available evidence, it leans more violet than cherry. The review describes a strong bitter, powdery violet opening, with the sweeter fruit effect becoming clearer later.

Does Magic + Science smell like Parma Violets?+

It can. The supplied review directly compares it to Parma Violet, especially once the fragrance softens and sweetens in the later stages.

Is Magic + Science very sweet?+

It looks sweet overall, but not necessarily syrupy or candy-like throughout. The opening may come across more bitter and powdery before the sweeter side develops.

Is Magic + Science a gourmand fragrance?+

Not in a rich dessert-like way from the evidence here. It seems closer to a powdery violet scent with fruity sweetness than a dense edible gourmand.

How long does Magic + Science last?+

The only supplied wear report says it lasted over 6 hours, which suggests moderate wear. With such limited data, it is best to treat that as one user experience rather than a fixed rule.

How strong is the projection?+

One review reports a noticeable scent bubble for around 3 to 4 hours. That points to a fairly present opening and early mid-phase, though more wear reports would be needed for confidence.

Does Magic + Science have much depth?+

The current review evidence suggests it may feel quite linear. One wearer specifically described it as singular and said there was not a lot of depth.

Who might enjoy Magic + Science most?+

It may suit someone who likes powdery violet fragrances, soft musks and a slightly quirky candy-floral feel. If you already enjoy old-fashioned violet tones, it is likely more interesting.

Who should sample before buying?+

Anyone expecting a juicy cherry fragrance or a more layered sweet scent should sample first. The available review suggests the violet note dominates and the composition may feel simple.

Rankings

Full rankings
Overall#58,717
Top Rated,
Most Reviewed#32,945
Best Longevity#14,088
Best Sillage#7,700
Price Value#15,158

Wear Diary

0 COMMUNITY WEAR LOGS

Keep sprays, longevity, weather, and compliments in one practical log.

Sign in to keep private wear notes.

Compliment Signal

FROM WEAR LOGS
0TOTAL
0.00PER WEAR
0WEAR LOGS
0COMPLIMENTED

Reviews

1 TOTAL
3.0
★★★★★★★★★★
From 1 reviews

No owner review yet. You can be the first.

Dupes & Alternatives

COMMUNITY DUPESCORE

No dupes submitted yet. The first useful DupeScore can come from your community.

Evidence is too thin for a strong dupe claim. The safest comparison is by style rather than outright similarity: this seems to sit closer to powdery violet candy fragrances than to lush cherry gourmands. If your goal is juicy cherry, dense sweetness or clear note progression, it may be better to compare it against more fruit-forward or more obviously gourmand options before buying.

Suggest a dupe

DUPESCORE (1–10)
COMMUNITY PULSE

Live questions about Magic + Science

Ask one quick question and let the community weigh in while it is live.

No live pulse yet.

Trusted Sellers

Community-submitted stores that regular buyers trust, by country.

No trusted sellers added for this fragrance yet.

RetailerDiscounterDecanterMarketplace

Where to Sample

Discovery sets, official samples, and trusted decants.

No sample or decant options shared for this fragrance yet.

Official sampleDiscovery setDecant
DISCOVERY LAB · BETA

Suggestion Studio

Build a live match around the parts of Magic + Science that matter to you.

1 Criteria2 Refine3 Results
CHOOSE AT LEAST TWO
Contribute

Add community data

Share a useful, specific detail with the community.

Community take

Add your take

Keep it clear, useful, and grounded in your own wear.

Share today’s wear

Scent of the Day · Monday, Sep 28

TODAY’S PICK
Magic + ScienceThursday
QUICK RATING
Very good
MOOD
WEATHER
OCCASION
SPRAYS2 sprays
VISIBILITY

Write a review

For Magic + Science by Thursday. Every tag feeds the community data on this page.

YOUR RATING
Very good
LONGEVITY ON YOUR SKIN
SILLAGE
PRICE VALUE
WHEN DID YOU WEAR IT?
OCCASION
HOW IT READS
YOUR BOTTLE
POSTS AS @MEMBER · COUNTS TOWARD RR SCORE