Paul Smith Rose 2013
Paul Smith Rose 2013 is a light, dewy rose fragrance with watery notes, peony, magnolia and soft musk over a gentle woody base. It smells clean and fresh from the start, with none of the heavy sweetness some rose perfumes lean on. It makes the most sense for daytime, especially in spring and warm weather. If you want a rose scent that.
Similar Suggestions
BETAFragrances with the nearest note and performance profile.
For more in-depth suggestions.
Performance Metrics
109 VOTESOpen Performance Breakdown 1 TAKE
Performance appears variable from the available votes. It can feel light and fairly close to the skin on some wearers, while others may get a stronger opening and moderate staying power. This looks more like an easy daytime floral than a powerhouse, with the freshest effect likely in the first part of wear.
Notes Pyramid
Search these notesChoose where each note belongs.
The scent profile is centered on fresh rose, softened by peony and magnolia and lifted by watery notes and a touch of bergamot. Underneath, musk, ambrette, sandalwood and cedar give it a clean, lightly woody finish. Overall it smells airy, floral, musky and gently powdery rather than sweet, spicy or dense.
Main Accords
8 MAPPEDThe rose accord seems dewy rather than jammy, and the aquatic freshness keeps the florals feeling sheer and breathable. Musk and pale woods add a clean fabric-like softness in the dry-down, while the powdery facet stays in the background. The result is a floral texture that feels smooth, fresh and lightly polished.
Community Data
222 TOTAL VOTESCOMMUNITY SENTIMENT
OWNERSHIP STATS
GENDER APPEAL
REVIEW SENTIMENT
When to Wear
TAP TO VOTETIME OF DAY · TAP TO VOTE
OCCASIONS · TAP TO VOTE
It looks easiest to wear in spring and summer. The vote picture leans most toward daytime.
Pros & Cons
Quick take before you sampleWHY PEOPLE MAY LIKE IT
Fresh, dewy rose profile
Airy floral style for daytime
Watery notes keep it crisp
Peony and magnolia add softness
Musky woody base feels clean
Works well in spring weather
Easy to wear in mild summer
Less sweet than many rose perfumes
Suitable for office and casual settings
Good option for fans of sheer florals
WHAT TO WATCH OUT FOR
Performance may feel inconsistent
Can come across as too light for some
Not ideal if you want a rich rose
Aquatic tone may not suit every taste
Limited depth compared with heavier florals
May need reapplication for longer days
Projection does not look reliably strong
Powdery touch could feel soft-focus rather than vivid
Probably too understated for statement-scent shoppers
Less appealing for lovers of gourmand or chypre roses
Fragranxe Review
EDITORIAL“Paul Smith Rose 2013 Review”
Paul Smith Rose 2013 takes a familiar floral theme and keeps it light on its feet. This is not a dark, velvety rose and it does not seem built around syrup, spice or thick powder. The structure points instead to a dewy rose with watery notes, peony and magnolia up top, then a soft musky, woody base that keeps everything smooth and clean.
The opening is likely the main selling point. Bergamot and watery notes suggest a bright, fresh lift before the rose fully settles in. That gives the fragrance a crisp, transparent feel rather than a plush one. If you enjoy rose perfumes that smell polished and easy rather than dramatic, this style makes sense. It reads more like fresh petals and clean skin than a dense bouquet in a vase.
Through the heart, rose stays central, but the supporting florals matter. Peony can add a breezy, slightly rosy pink softness, while magnolia often brings a creamy floral sheen without turning the scent heavy. That combination helps explain why this fragrance may appeal to people who like floral perfumes but do not want anything too mature, too sweet or too formal. The mood looks relaxed and daytime-friendly.
The base appears understated. Natural musk, ambrette, sandalwood and cedar suggest a smooth finish with a little texture, but not much weight. On skin, that usually means the rose remains the focus while the woods and musks stop it from feeling thin. The accord profile also hints at a mild powdery touch, though it seems secondary to the fresher floral side. Expect softness and cleanliness more than depth.
Performance looks mixed in the available wear data, so this is not the fragrance to buy for raw power alone. Some wearers may find it light and fairly intimate after the opening, while others may get a more noticeable trail for a while. The safest expectation is moderate wear with variability depending on skin, weather and how heavily you spray. Daytime use in spring and summer fits the scent profile best.
For the right wearer, the appeal is straightforward. Paul Smith Rose 2013 suits someone who wants a rose fragrance that feels airy, modern and uncomplicated. It should work well for work, casual daytime wear, brunch, travel and generally any setting where a soft floral feels more useful than a statement scent. If your taste runs toward rich oriental roses, earthy chypres or edible gourmand styles, this may come across as too sheer. Sample first if you are chasing intensity or complexity.
FAQs
What does Paul Smith Rose 2013 smell like?+
It smells like a fresh, watery rose with peony, magnolia, soft musk and light woods underneath. The overall effect reads airy, clean and floral rather than dense or syrupy.
Is Paul Smith Rose 2013 a sweet rose perfume?+
Not especially. Based on the notes and accord profile, it leans fresher, more aquatic and musky than sugary or candied.
Does Paul Smith Rose 2013 feel powdery?+
A little. The powdery side looks present but secondary, so most wearers are more likely to notice the rose, watery freshness and soft musk first.
Is Paul Smith Rose 2013 good for spring?+
Yes. Spring is the strongest fit in the available wear patterns, and the dewy floral style also makes sense in mild summer weather.
Can you wear Paul Smith Rose 2013 in summer?+
Yes, especially in daytime or in moderate heat. Its watery rose profile should feel easier to wear than a heavier rose fragrance.
Is Paul Smith Rose 2013 better for day or night?+
It appears to lean more daytime than night. The fresh floral structure and the wear data both point in that direction.
How long does Paul Smith Rose 2013 last?+
The available longevity votes are mixed. On some people it may feel fairly light, while others may get moderate to longer wear, so it is safer to expect mid-level performance rather than guaranteed all-day power.
How strong is the projection?+
Projection also looks mixed. It can wear fairly close on some people, but there is also evidence that it may project more noticeably in the opening.
Who is Paul Smith Rose 2013 best for?+
It is best suited to someone who wants a rose perfume that feels clean, fresh and easy to wear. If you prefer deep, spicy, gourmand or chypre roses, this may feel too airy.
Is this a good blind buy for rose lovers?+
It is safer for people who already enjoy fresh, watery rose perfumes. If you want a richer or more dramatic rose, sampling first is the better move.
Rankings
Full rankingsWear Diary
0 COMMUNITY WEAR LOGSKeep sprays, longevity, weather, and compliments in one practical log.
Sign in to keep private wear notes.
Compliment Signal
FROM WEAR LOGSReviews
No owner review yet. You can be the first.
Dupes & Alternatives
COMMUNITY DUPESCOREEvidence is too thin for a firm dupe claim, and this does not look like the kind of fragrance that should be matched loosely just because it features rose. The more useful comparison is style: this sits in the fresh, watery rose lane rather than the dark, spicy, gourmand or chypre rose family. Sample accordingly if that is the rose profile you prefer.
No User submitted dupes yet. The first useful DupeScore can come from your community.
Live questions about Paul Smith Rose 2013
Ask one quick question and let the community weigh in while it is live.
No live pulse yet.
Trusted Sellers
Community-submitted stores that regular buyers trust, by country.
No trusted sellers added for this fragrance yet.
Where to Sample
Discovery sets, official samples, and trusted decants.
No sample or decant options shared for this fragrance yet.